A. Brad Hogg has not performed so well given a chance. While Shaun Tait given a chance has proved his worth so far. Brad Hogg is allrounder, while Shaun Tait is just fast bowler. Brad Hogg if in good form can me more helpul. Brad Hogg bats very down the order, has not got much chance to bat.

A. With addition of Shane Watson, batting line for RR is quite strong, Shane Tait being a strike bowler is rightly given priority over Brad Hogg.

A. No way. Shaun tait is a consistent performer in this format of game and he is a wicket taker. Pitch has little bit of grass on it so this will help him a lot.

A. It is a burning question and i think the most difficult one that what is important economy or wickets. As one has consequences on another. Shaun tait may not be that much economic but he brings you wickets while Hogg is also economic and take wickets but he is not proven threat for batsman. Tait with his pace threaten the batsman and push them on back foot. He just not take wickets himself but set the platform for the rest to take wickets too. And he as being a pace bowler useful to death overs too where hogg is not good and we all know how important a good death bowler is. So Tait should given a chance ahead of Hogg.

A. Well, it is a balance between both of them. Tait can rattle batsman with his Pace and control the economy, whereas Hogg would pick wickets and maintain Economy too. So answer is Yes, as Shaun Tait may be unpredictable sometimes and can go for runs and Hogg has been consistent

A. I think Brad hogg is better alternative because he can vary his pace and can also bowl googlies at any point of time.Shaun tait will always prove costly due to his pace which makes it easier for batsmen to play the ball towards the boundary.