Fuel For Debate, Blog : Castrol Cricket
Castrol India CastrolCricket
 
 

blog

Friday, June 12, 2009

Windies hitting hard, Pakistan hardly

West Indies is scoring most of their runs in boundaries while surprisingly Pakistan are running through the 22 yards the most during their matches in 2009 ICC T20 World Championship, according to Castrol Index.

The strategy may be to have a right mix of boundaries and singles / two’s / three’s. Singles help rotating the strike making it that much difficult for the opposition bowlers to maintain a tight line and length. But Pakistan is relying too much on the running which is slowing their run rate. England, India, Sri Lanka and South Africa are balancing the boundary single mix perfectly to launch a healthy Batting Momentum.

According to Castrol Index, the Windies hurricane continued through the two matches during the Group stage, when they scored 64% of their runs in boundaries and sixes. Even in the match against Sri Lanka, the West Indian hard hitting was maintained. The Lankans are also not very far behind scoring 63% in boundaries. The flurry of boundaries during the start of the innings, determined by Quickstart Batting, and during the last 5 overs of the innings, captured by Extreme Performance Batting, has helped these two teams to lock high scores in the tournament so far and attain high Batting Momentum for their respective teams.

Team Total Runs % scored in 4s, 6s Quickstart Batting Extreme Performance Batting Batting Momentum
West Indies 349 64 135 195 279
Sri Lanka 352 63 63 182 261
England 347 53 41 80 242
South Africa 339 58 77 79 237
Pakistan 312 46 48 32 203
India 313 54 56 99 202
New Zealand 217 59 98 24 148
Ireland 250 54 110 66 143
Australia 328 63 49 23 222

Pakistan on the contrary has scored 54% of their runs through singles, twos and three’s. It should be a cause of concern for skipper Younis Khan as his team needs to get more boundaries in the Super 8s to put the opposition under pressure.

England, though having a healthy Batting Momentum, needs to score more runs through boundaries during Quickstart period which may relieve the pressure on the middle order to increase the rate.

India’s opening pair has done a good job so far, but against comparatively weaker opposition, they have managed to get only 56 Quickstart Batting points probably because they were able to hit lesser boundaries during these periods.

The notable exclusion from the Super 8s will be Australia, who true to their style, scored heavily through boundaries.

 

Posted by castroladmin on 06/12 at 12:43 AM
(0) Comments

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

What went wrong for Australia?

Losing back-to-back matches and bowing out of a World Championship early in the first round is not something that Australian cricket is used to. Was it lack of match practice that led to their elimination?

Since 2005, when Australia played its first T20 International, it has played 19 matches, including the two in the current Championship and lost only seven of them. Prior to the World Championship, Australia won the warm-up games too. So, the notion that Australian cricket is not tuned to T20 cricket can therefore be safely ruled out.

Australia in T20 Internationals

Played Won
19 12

Now let’s dig deeper into the reasons for Australia’s early departure.
The following table demonstrates the trends from the matches played at the two venues where Australia played their matches.

Venue Average First Innings Score Wickets taken by Team batting second wins Wicket in 2nd innings Wickets by Australia in 2009 ICC T20
Kennington Oval 180 90% by fast bowlers 5 out of 8 4.9 3
Trent Bridge 150 33% by Spinners 5 out of 6 5.5 4

Australia’s scores barely touched the averages at both the venues, which was obviously not enough to upstage the opponent. Also skipper Ricky Ponting chose to bat first at The Oval where the records clearly favoured the team batting second. But in both the matches, it was their bowlers that disappointed Australia with lackadaisical performances, since most of the fast bowlers were awfully short of match practice. Their bowlers took lesser number of wickets against the average second innings wicket fall at these venues.

Australian Bowling Efficiency at 2009 ICC T20

Team Bowling Efficiency
West Indies 55
Sri Lanka 95

Talking of match practice, large number of players from most of the Test playing nations played in IPL 2009. What better match practice can one expect! Sri Lanka had four of them playing regularly in the IPL who contributing heavily to their team’s victory over Australia. West Indies had Chris Gayle and Dwayne Bravo, amongst the members of the current ICC T20 squad who played the IPL. The sheer number of matches that they played in the IPL helped them to be on top of their form in the ICC T20 as demonstrated by the table below. It gives a head-to-head comparison on how the players have carried their forms from IPL to the ICC T20 Championship.

Team Player CI in IPL 2009 CI in ICC T20 2009
West Indies Chris Gayle 35 158
Dwayne Bravo 50 57
Andre Fletcher DNP 93
Sri Lanka Tillakratne Dilshan 43 93
Kumar Sangakkara 22 71
Lasith Malinga 45 70
Ajantha Mendis 13 115

In contrast, Australia played only 3 who are currently part of the team, as shown in the table below. The others were Adam Gilchrist and Matthew Hayden – both retired.

Team Player CI in IPL 2009 CI in ICC T20 against WI CI in ICC T20 against SL
Australia David Warner 39 75 0
Brett Lee 35 10 26
Andrew Symonds 66 DNP DNP
David Hussey 33 51 42

*DNP = Did Not Play

One of the most successful Australian in the IPL was Andrew Symonds. But then, he was not part of the ICC T20 team. That’s another story!

But amongst these 3 players, namely David Warner, David Hussey were the top performers. Warner top scored against Windies to attain a Castrol Index of 75. David Hussey performed well in both the matches while Lee bowled much better in the second match.

Match practice really helps! Australia just didn’t give too much importance to the T20 formats. Or was it that Australia was too busy preparing for The Ashes series.

Posted by castroladmin on 06/10 at 12:57 AM
(0) Comments