<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>blog</title>
    <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/comments</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>sports@castrolcricket.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-04-26T12:01:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Does the IPL really need more foreign players?</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/does_the_ipl_really_need_more_foreign_players/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/does_the_ipl_really_need_more_foreign_players/#When:12:01:52Z</guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-04-26T12:01:52+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Will the Pakistani players be missed at the IPL?</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/will_the_pakistani_players_be_missed_at_the_ipl/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/will_the_pakistani_players_be_missed_at_the_ipl/#When:10:29:12Z</guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-03-05T10:29:12+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>MSD &#45; Will 2010 be a sequel to 2009?</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/msd_-_will_2010_be_a_sequel_to_2009/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/msd_-_will_2010_be_a_sequel_to_2009/#When:21:06:37Z</guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T21:06:37+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Rahul Dravid – back from beyond</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/rahul_dravid_back_from_beyond/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/rahul_dravid_back_from_beyond/#When:11:29:34Z</guid>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-09-24T11:29:34+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Dream Team Twenty 20 &#45; 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/the_dream_team_twenty_20_-_2009/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/the_dream_team_twenty_20_-_2009/#When:09:49:15Z</guid>
      <description>In our previous article we picked the best individual performances at the World Twenty20. This time round, we identify the players who performed well consistently throughout the tournament and pick the best eleven of the tournament&#45; the Dream Team. One caveat before we begin our selection&#45; we are looking at players who have participated in at least four matches, long enough for them to have shown consistency over a number of matches. Here is the World Twenty20 2009 Dream Team. 

.p_role{color:#000;} .bb_fig_cont {display:none;} .pp_unit{border:0; } .dreamtable td{padding:10px; border:1px solid #666;}


  
    
       
      
    
     Tillakaratne Dilshan Batsman 
    Runs: 317
      Strike Rate: 144.7
      Castrol Index: 81
      An easy selection to begin with&#45; Dilshan was the stand out batsman of the tournament scoring nearly 100 more runs than his closest competitor.
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Jacques Kallis All Rounder 
    Runs: 238
      Strike Rate: 126.6
      Wickets: 3
      Economy Rate: 7.1
      Castrol Index:76
    The South African all&#45;rounder showed he can perform at the highest level even in the shortest form of the game finishing as the tournament’s second highest run scorer and leading South Africa’s charge to the semis.
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Shahid Afridi All Rounder 
    Runs: 176
      Strike Rate: 140.8
       Wickets: 11
      Economy Rate: 5.3
      Castrol Index: 89
    Another easy pick&#45; Afridi was miserly with the ball throughout the tournament, picked up regular wickets, and came through with the bat in the big matches. Probably the best Twenty20 player in the world at the moment!
  
    
    
       
      
    
     AB de Villiers Wicketkeeper 
    Runs: 186
      Strike Rate: 155.0
      Castrol Index: 60
     AB was consistent with the bat and the tournament’s best fielder&#45; his stock as a cricketer has risen tremendously over the past twelve months. 
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Lendl Simmons Wicketkeeper 
    Runs: 150
      Strike Rate: 137.6
      Castrol Index: 64
     The young West Indian had a great run with the bat and was also handy with the ball, picking up 6 wickets including a four&#45;for against Sri Lanka. He edged out the likes of Kevin Pietersen and Yuvraj Singh for this spot.
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Kumar Sangakkara Wicketkeeper 
    Runs: 177
      Strike Rate: 108.6
      Castrol Index: 36
     Not a great tournament with the bat by his standards. Still, he up with a gritty performance in the final, was the best keeper&#45;batsman in the tournament and admirably led his side throughout the competition; which rightfully earns him a place in the Dream Team. 
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Dwayne Bravo All Rounder 
    Runs: 154
      Strike Rate:145.3
      Wickets:10
      Economy rate:8.8
      Castrol Index: 74
      Stellar contributions from Bravo helped the West Indies make the final four&#45; he delivered with bat and ball including a super all&#45;round display against India at Lord’s. 
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Saeed Ajmal Bowler 
    
      Wickets: 12
      Economy rate:5.8
      Castrol Index: 59
     The Pakistani off&#45;spinner played a pivotal role for his side, keeping it tight in the middle overs and frustrating batsmen into making mistakes.
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Ajantha Mendis Bowler 
    
      Wickets: 12
      Economy rate:5.5
      Castrol Index: 55
   The mystery bowler ended with the highest bowling efficiency score among all players who participated in at least four matches. That means based on bowling alone, Mendis was the best of the lot and he makes it in the Dream Team. 
   Roelof van der Merwe can consider himself unlucky to miss out on, but Ajmal and Mendis get the nod ahead of him. Barely! 

  
    
    
       
      
    
     Umar Gul Bowler 
    
        Wickets: 13
      Economy rate:6.4
      Castrol Index: 52
     The tournament’s highest wicket taker established himself as the best death bowler in the game. It’s remarkable that he went at just six and a half runs an over considering he often bowled at the end of the innings. 
  
    
    
       
      
    
     Wayne Parnell Bowler 
    
      Wickets: 9
      Economy rate:5.7
      Castrol Index: 53
     Parnell rounds up our Dream Team. He was the best bowler with the new ball and turned in match winning performances against the West Indies and England.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-23T09:49:15+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Harsha Bhogle&#8217;s take on Finals</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/harsha_bhogles_take_on_finals/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/harsha_bhogles_take_on_finals/#When:14:28:18Z</guid>
      <description>sri lanka’s progress in this tournament is a great advertisement for bowlers in t20 cricket. with a slightly shaky batting line up that is over&#45;reliant at the moment on the top 4 they have marched into the final without losing a game. but now they will come up against a side to whom their bowling isn’t a great mystery and who possess a well rounded bowling side themselves.

sri lanka are riding a wave of confidence but will be a bit worried about the fact that they have been propped up by the great form of tillekaratne dilshan. sanath jayasuriya isn’t looking in great form but he is one of the finest big game players and if he plays with freedom in the final, he could give sri lanka the runs they need for their bowlers.

both sides like to bat first and while the toss isn’t that important in t20 normally (it was at trent bridge where, quite frankly the wickets weren’t suitable for a tournament of this nature), on the big day you want to score runs first. it means a great deal for both sides to win this and there will be the extra, difficult to account for, factor of pressure. if sri lanka have to bat second and lose a couple of early wickets pakistan will fancy their chances.

but then you just can’t tell with pakistan. afridi might fire a quick 50 or pop the first ball up in the air. that is why the return of razzak is so important for them. it allows them to bat till no 8 and absorb a few early losses. i have also noticed that shoaib malik is playing a lot of shots early on and maybe the mandate is that younus and misbah will handle a crisis if it arises and that the top three, especially akmal and afridi, will be given the licence to play the big shots.

pakistan are looking the more rounded side but they have to play two opponents; sri  lanka and themselves. by contrast the lankans have only to play pakistan.

Harsha Bhogle</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-20T14:28:18+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>To chase or to defend: Oval throws important question</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/to_chase_or_to_defend_oval_throws_important_question/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/to_chase_or_to_defend_oval_throws_important_question/#When:20:52:18Z</guid>
      <description>The Kennington Oval is a batting paradise but the wicket slows down considerably under the lights. A 45&#45;run difference between the average first innings and second innings score at this venue may emerge as a key to the strategists of West Indies and Sri Lanka.



Average 1st Innings score
Average 2nd Innings score
1st innings wicket fall
2nd innings wicket fall
Spinners
Pacers


180
135
6.8
6.2
36
78



The high scoring nature of this wicket will help both Sri Lanka and West Indies. Secondly, traditionally the Oval wicket is very balanced as out of the 10 T20 Internationals played here, 5 of them are won by team batting first.

So what should a captain do? Chase a target or defend a total? Let’s weigh the options.

Considering the hard hitting ways of batting in both the sides, an average first innings total of 180 or more would be the ideal start that both the teams will be looking at. According to Castrol Index, Sri Lanka has won 80% of its matches batting first with a par score of 161 and a Batting Momentum (BM) of 215. 

What is more bothering, however, is that the average second innings score at the Oval is around 135. The 45 runs difference between the two innings, coupled with Sri Lanka’s bowling prowess may land West Indies in trouble should they decide to chase here. The three main Windies’ bowlers – Bravo, Taylor and Edwards – have given away around 9 runs per over in this tournament, which translates to around 110 runs in the 12 overs they bowl. In contrast, the Lankan trio of Mendis, Murali and Malinga concede only 75 runs in their 12 overs. This difference of 35 runs is a huge savings in a T20 International. Will Sri Lanka be better off defending a total on this wicket then?

Now let’s see the options favourable to chasing:

•	Gayle and other Windies’ batsmen are in great form and have proved that they are great chasers. They have to score at least 35 runs more off the Lankan Three M’s to offset any calculation
•	The Oval wicket offers fewer opportunities to bowlers in the second innings 
•	80% of the wickets at the Oval are captured by pacers – a big plus for the Windies which is packed with fast bowlers. But they have to be disciplined and should not give away extra runs.

West Indies have proved earlier that they are good chasers at the Oval. Will they take the chance again at the Oval?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-18T20:52:18+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The curious case of Trent Bridge Nottingham</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/the_curious_case_of_trent_bridge_nottingham/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/the_curious_case_of_trent_bridge_nottingham/#When:05:41:58Z</guid>
      <description>Twenty&#45;twenty matches in Trent Bridge are a bit skewed in favour of the team batting first. Castrol Index analyses the International T20 matches played at the venue and throws the question what’s the best decision to take after winning the toss – bat first or bowl first?

According to Castrol Index, 56% of the matches played on the Trent Bridge pitch have been won by teams batting first. South Africa has won all its matches played on the Trent Bridge pitch. 



Trent Bridge 
Batting Momentum
Average Runs Scored
Bowling Efficiency
Total Wickets 


Batting First
251
174
238
54


Batting Second
163
131
269
60



The table above reflects an interesting fact. Teams batting first have scored more runs at the cost of more wickets than teams batting second on their way to win the matches. Batting first, teams have been able to put an average of 174 runs losing at an average of 6 wickets while teams bowling second have taken an average of 6.5 wickets while scoring only 131 runs. The analysis reflects the slowness of the wicket which deteriorates within a matter of 20 overs. 

South Africa would be aware of this curious nature of the pitch here as they have played twice here and won both the times. Interestingly, for South Africa, batting first or batting second matter the least. In this tournament, they have just won every match till now, batting first or second.

But for Pakistan, it is for the first time they will play on this wicket in the tournament. Pakistan plays better cricket when they bat first as reflected in the table below. 

Pakistan’s Performance in 2009 ICC T20



Pakistan
Batting Momentum
Average Runs Scored
Bowling Efficiency
Total Wickets


Batting First
207
167
338
19


Batting Second
142
123
223
22



In view of the above, what would be skipper Younis Khan’s decision of if he wins the toss?</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-18T05:41:58+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Windies hitting hard, Pakistan hardly</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/windies_hitting_hard_pakistan_hardly/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/windies_hitting_hard_pakistan_hardly/#When:20:13:06Z</guid>
      <description>West Indies is scoring most of their runs in boundaries while surprisingly Pakistan are running through the 22 yards the most during their matches in 2009 ICC T20 World Championship, according to Castrol Index. 

The strategy may be to have a right mix of boundaries and singles / two’s / three’s. Singles help rotating the strike making it that much difficult for the opposition bowlers to maintain a tight line and length. But Pakistan is relying too much on the running which is slowing their run rate. England, India, Sri Lanka and South Africa are balancing the boundary single mix perfectly to launch a healthy Batting Momentum.

According to Castrol Index, the Windies hurricane continued through the two matches during the Group stage, when they scored 64% of their runs in boundaries and sixes. Even in the match against Sri Lanka, the West Indian hard hitting was maintained. The Lankans are also not very far behind scoring 63% in boundaries. The flurry of boundaries during the start of the innings, determined by Quickstart Batting, and during the last 5 overs of the innings, captured by Extreme Performance Batting, has helped these two teams to lock high scores in the tournament so far and attain high Batting Momentum for their respective teams.



Team
Total Runs
% scored in 4s, 6s
Quickstart Batting
Extreme Performance Batting
Batting Momentum


West Indies
349
64
135
195
279


Sri Lanka
352
63
63
182
261


England
347
53
41
80
242


South Africa
339
58
77
79
237


Pakistan
312
46
48
32
203


India
313
54
56
99
202


New Zealand
217
59
98
24
148


Ireland
250
54
110
66
143


Australia
328
63
49
23
222



Pakistan on the contrary has scored 54% of their runs through singles, twos and three’s. It should be a cause of concern for skipper Younis Khan as his team needs to get more boundaries in the Super 8s to put the opposition under pressure. 

England, though having a healthy Batting Momentum, needs to score more runs through boundaries during Quickstart period which may relieve the pressure on the middle order to increase the rate.

India’s opening pair has done a good job so far, but against comparatively weaker opposition, they have managed to get only 56 Quickstart Batting points probably because they were able to hit lesser boundaries during these periods. 

The notable exclusion from the Super 8s will be Australia, who true to their style, scored heavily through boundaries. 
 

&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-11T20:13:06+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>What went wrong for Australia?</title>
      <link>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/castrol/blog/what_went_wrong_for_australia/</link>
      <guid>http://www.castrolcricket.com/ee/index.php/blog/what_went_wrong_for_australia/#When:20:27:28Z</guid>
      <description>Losing back&#45;to&#45;back matches and bowing out of a World Championship early in the first round is not something that Australian cricket is used to. Was it lack of match practice that led to their elimination?

Since 2005, when Australia played its first T20 International, it has played 19 matches, including the two in the current Championship and lost only seven of them. Prior to the World Championship, Australia won the warm&#45;up games too. So, the notion that Australian cricket is not tuned to T20 cricket can therefore be safely ruled out. 

Australia in T20 Internationals



Played
Won


19
12



Now let’s dig deeper into the reasons for Australia’s early departure. 
The following table demonstrates the trends from the matches played at the two venues where Australia played their matches. 



Venue
Average First Innings Score
Wickets taken by
Team batting second wins
Wicket in 2nd innings
Wickets by Australia in 2009 ICC T20


Kennington Oval
180
90% by fast bowlers
5 out of 8
4.9
3


Trent Bridge
150
33% by Spinners
5 out of 6
5.5
4



Australia’s scores barely touched the averages at both the venues, which was obviously not enough to upstage the opponent. Also skipper Ricky Ponting chose to bat first at The Oval where the records clearly favoured the team batting second. But in both the matches, it was their bowlers that disappointed Australia with lackadaisical performances, since most of the fast bowlers were awfully short of match practice. Their bowlers took lesser number of wickets against the average second innings wicket fall at these venues.

Australian Bowling Efficiency at 2009 ICC T20



Team
Bowling Efficiency


West Indies
55


Sri Lanka
95



Talking of match practice, large number of players from most of the Test playing nations played in IPL 2009. What better match practice can one expect! Sri Lanka had four of them playing regularly in the IPL who contributing heavily to their team’s victory over Australia. West Indies had Chris Gayle and Dwayne Bravo, amongst the members of the current ICC T20 squad who played the IPL. The sheer number of matches that they played in the IPL helped them to be on top of their form in the ICC T20 as demonstrated by the table below. It gives a head&#45;to&#45;head comparison on how the players have carried their forms from IPL to the ICC T20 Championship.



Team
Player
CI in IPL 2009
CI in ICC T20 2009


West Indies
Chris Gayle
35
158



Dwayne Bravo
50
57



Andre Fletcher
DNP
93


Sri Lanka
Tillakratne Dilshan
43
93



Kumar Sangakkara
22
71



Lasith Malinga
45
70



Ajantha Mendis
13
115



In contrast, Australia played only 3 who are currently part of the team, as shown in the table below. The others were Adam Gilchrist and Matthew Hayden – both retired.



Team
Player
CI in IPL 2009
CI in ICC T20 against WI
CI in ICC T20 against SL


Australia
David Warner
39
75 
0 



Brett Lee
35
10 
26 



Andrew Symonds
66
DNP
DNP



David Hussey
33
51 
42 


*DNP = Did Not Play

One of the most successful Australian in the IPL was Andrew Symonds. But then, he was not part of the ICC T20 team. That’s another story!

But amongst these 3 players, namely David Warner, David Hussey were the top performers. Warner top scored against Windies to attain a Castrol Index of 75. David Hussey performed well in both the matches while Lee bowled much better in the second match. 

Match practice really helps! Australia just didn’t give too much importance to the T20 formats. Or was it that Australia was too busy preparing for The Ashes series.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2009-06-09T20:27:28+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>