Expert Blog
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Our expert makes an interesting analysis of the ODI performances of some phenomenal batsmen over the years. Are your favourites in there?
Our expert makes an interesting analysis of the ODI performances of
some phenomenal batsmen over the years. Are your favourites in there?
A month ago I had written about the greatest ODI bowlers of all time.
A similar analysis has now been done for batsmen. Not surprisingly,
there are quite a few Indians in this list and the current crop of
youngsters has some big shoes to fill.
Similar to the previous
article, a bubble chart was created with the size of the bubble
indicating the aggregate runs compiled in one’s career. Only the top 20
ODI run-getters have been compared for now, more on this a little
later.

In the graph above, the more top-right a batsman the better he is. You
may ask what the lines in the middle of the chart are - well what’s the
point of creating such a chart without a 2x2 matrix!
Each
quadrant of the graph represents a particular breed of batsmen, with the
best of the best on the top right. Here’s how the players can be broken
down in four groups :
(Side note: after spending way too much
time thinking through catchy names, these are the best four acronyms I
could come up with)
Group 1: The STAGS (Skilled Tenacious Almost Greats)
This
is the bottom left section of the graph comprising Jayawardene,
Sangakkara, Azhar and Atapattu. Four fantastic batsmen who often
delivered when the chips were down and fought till the very end.
However, their averages and strike-rates are not quite enough to make
them the best of all time.
Group 2: CLASS batsmen (Consistent Long-lasters Although Sometimes Slow)
Ok,
I was pushing the acronym a bit but I think it’s fitting to call
Kallis, Yousuf, Mark Waugh, Ganguly, Chanderpaul, Dravid, Haynes and
Inzamam class batsmen. These guys are the pretty stroke-makers who put
emphasis on style and managed to play long innings. In fact, after
India’s recent thrashing against Sri Lanka, a friend of mine joked that
India should bring Dravid and Ganguly back into the ODI side - at least
then the team would last 50 overs! But that’s the hallmark of class
batsmen; they consistently stick around for a long time at the crease
leading to healthy averages in the 40s. They can however be guilty of
not scoring quick enough at times. The same can’t be said for our next
group.
Group 3: The BOMBS (Break-it Or Make-it Blitzkriegs)
Five
batsmen in this group- Jayasuirya, Gilchrist, Gibbs, DeSilva and Anwar.
All with strike-rates in excess of 80, Gilchrist up at 96.94! No real
explanation needed for the BOMBs, destructive batsmen at their best but
they provide chances for the opposition to defuse them early.
Group 4: STARS (Supremely Talented All-round Run-machines)
Lara,
Ponting and Tendulkar- your all-time ODI greats. These three are
complete batsmen, with the ability to score quickly and consistently.
Tendulkar leads the pack with an average of 45.12, a strike-rate of
86.26 and a career aggregate of 17,598 runs (and counting!)
A
caveat to the above analysis - in picking the top 20 ODI run-scorers of
all time, some of the more recent prolific ODI run getters like Dhoni,
Pietersen, Symonds and Hussey were left out. A couple of retired ODI
greats, Michael Bevan and Viv Richards also don’t make the cut and we’ll
consider them in a later article. For now, this is just a comparison of
the top 20 ODI run-getters and since most of them, with the exception
of Haynes, played in roundabout the same era; we do not have to make any
significant adjustments on averages or strike-rates to account for the
era one played in.
The classification of batsmen in a 2x2 matrix
gives us a way of placing new batsmen in particular groups when trying
to assess their potential. What kind of a batsman will Virender Sehwag
be by the time his career winds up? He’ll probably end up in the bomb
category. What about Raina? He may end up being a class batsman.
Pietersen and Dhoni are likely to be stars. The next time you’re
figuring out the potential of an up and coming cricketer, you could try
and see where he fits on the matrix - a class batsman, a stag, a bomb or
a star.
Posted by Arvind Iyengar on 08/26 at 05:12 PM
Monday, August 16, 2010
Let’s take a look at how the Dambulla cricket ground in Sri Lanka has shaped up team performances over the years.
India was comprehensively beaten in the first ODI of the India-New Zealand-Sri Lanka tri-series. The batsmen deserve a lot of the blame after being skittled out for 88, one run short of Styris’ individual score and 7 short of Taylor’s. The bowlers didn’t come through either, and chasing 289 runs at Dambulla was always going to be a stiff task. Here’s a look at past performances at Dambulla, which gives us an indication of what to expect for the rest of the tri-series since all the matches will be played on this ground.
Of the 37 matches played at this venue, the side batting first has won 18 times while the side chasing has won 19, so there isn’t a marked advantage one way or the other. The average runs per over on this ground is 4.40, indicating an average score of 220 runs per 50 overs. The graph below shows the distribution of 1st innings scores at Dambulla and how those scores translate into wins or losses.
300 has been surpassed just twice - Pakistan got 385 and Sri Lanka reached 312 - both against Bangladesh. A competitive score seems to be in the 200-250 range. However, the scoring rate has increased over the past year, which means the par score today is more towards the higher side in the 200-250 bracket.
Further evidence of the pitch not being the most batting-friendly is that there have only been five centuries scored at this ground. Afridi makes the list twice, Jayasuriya and Jayawardene got centuries in 2009 while Rahul Dravid is the only Indian on the list and is the only one to have scored a ton at Dambulla pre-2009.
| Player |
Runs |
BF |
SR |
Opposition |
| Shahid Afridi (Pak) |
124 |
60 |
206.66 |
Bangladesh |
| Mahela Jayawardene (SL) |
123 |
108 |
113.88 |
Pakistan |
| Shahid Afridi (Pak) |
109 |
76 |
143.42 |
Sri Lanka |
| Sanath Jayasuriya (SL) |
107 |
114 |
93.85 |
India |
| Rahul Dravid (Ind) |
104 |
93 |
111.82 |
UAE |
While the pitch has eased for batting and scoring rates have increased, Dambulla still remains one of the more bowler-friendly ODI pitches today. It’s hard to get settled in and it will be important for batsmen who get a start to kick on and play a long innings, like Taylor and Styris did in the first ODI. Middle order batting could be the key in this series, and it’s an area where all three teams look somewhat shaky. Expect a close series with the batsmen really having to apply themselves on a tricky wicket.
Posted by Arvind Iyengar on 08/16 at 09:37 AM
Page 1 of 11 pages
Next Page
|
Recent Posts
- All-time best ODI run getters: Stags, Class, Bombs and Stars
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Winning scores for the India-New Zealand-Sri Lanka Tri-series
Monday, August 16, 2010
- Muralitharan and the all-time best ODI bowlers
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
- Mega Partnerships in ODIs
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
- Looking ahead to the 2011 World Cup
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
- Yuvraj Singh: To drop or not to drop?
Saturday, June 19, 2010
- Premier Batsmen in Twenty20 cricket
Thursday, May 27, 2010
- In-form Aussies have something to worry about
Sunday, May 09, 2010
- Breaking down the IPL Final
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
- The importance of openers in one-day internationals
Monday, March 08, 2010
- Best “back against the wall” innings
Friday, February 19, 2010
- Player of the Decade: Ponting or Muralitharan?
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
- The best batsmen of 2009
Thursday, December 24, 2009
- Leaving the Powerplay too late
Sunday, October 04, 2009
- One Worm to rule them all and tell you “Who’s winning?”
Monday, September 28, 2009
|